ASME B31.1 Pressure Design Explained: Pipe Thickness Calculation & Corrosion Allowance for Power Piping

Learn how pipe wall thickness is calculated under ASME B31.1. Understand pressure design, corrosion allowance, mill tolerance, and real plant examples from main steam and boiler feedwater piping.

Introduction

In piping engineering, pipe thickness is not chosen randomly, nor is it based only on experience or “what worked before.”
In power plants, refineries, oil & gas facilities, and chemical plants, pipe wall thickness is a safety-critical design decision governed by codes such as ASME B31.1 – Power Piping.

Many beginners believe that selecting a pipe schedule (for example, Schedule 40 or Schedule 80) automatically satisfies all design requirements. In real-world engineering, this assumption is dangerous and incorrect.

This article explains of ASME B31.1, focusing on:

  • Pressure design philosophy
  • Pipe thickness calculation
  • Corrosion allowance
  • Mill tolerance
  • Why minimum required thickness is not the same as practical thickness

Examples from main steam lines and boiler feedwater piping are included to connect theory with actual plant practice.

This article also links logically to:

  • Article 4 – Piping Materials
  • Article 6 – Thermal Expansion and Stress Analysis

Purpose of Pressure Design in Piping Engineering

The primary purpose of pressure design is to ensure that a pipe can safely contain internal pressure throughout its design life without:

  • Rupture
  • Excessive deformation
  • Progressive thinning due to corrosion or erosion

In ASME B31.1, pressure design ensures that:

  • Hoop stress remains within allowable limits
  • Long-term degradation is accounted for
  • Manufacturing tolerances are considered

Pressure design is one of the first checks a piping engineer performs after identifying:

  • Line number
  • Line designation
  • Fluid code
  • Design pressure
  • Design temperature
  • Piping class

These parameters are usually defined on the P&ID and piping line list.

Why Minimum Thickness Alone Is Not Enough

One of the most common mistakes made by junior engineers is assuming that:

“If the calculated thickness is 6 mm, selecting a 6 mm pipe is acceptable.”

This approach ignores several real-world factors:

  • Corrosion during service
  • Mill tolerance (manufacturing variation)
  • Future operating upsets
  • Erosion due to high-velocity flow

ASME B31.1 requires that additional thickness allowances be added to the calculated minimum thickness to ensure long-term safety and reliability.

Parameters Used in Pipe Thickness Calculation

Pipe thickness calculation under ASME B31.1 depends on several interrelated parameters. Each must be selected carefully.

1. Design Pressure

Design pressure is the maximum internal pressure the piping system is expected to experience during normal or upset conditions.

It is not the normal operating pressure.

Examples:

  • Main steam line operating at 160 bar → design pressure may be 170–180 bar
  • Boiler feedwater operating at 200 bar → design pressure may be 210–220 bar

Design pressure is typically defined by:

  • Process engineer
  • Mechanical design basis
  • P&ID notes

Using an incorrect design pressure directly results in an unsafe thickness calculation

2. Allowable Stress

Allowable stress is the maximum stress the pipe material can safely withstand at design temperature.

Key points:

  • Allowable stress decreases as temperature increases
  • It depends on the material specification (e.g., ASTM A106 Gr.B, ASTM A335 P91)
  • Values are provided in ASME allowable stress tables

For example:

  • Carbon steel allowable stress at 300°C is much lower than at ambient temperature
  • High-alloy steels are selected primarily for higher allowable stress at elevated temperatures

This is why material selection and pressure design are tightly linked.

3. Outside Diameter (OD)

ASME B31.1 thickness calculations are based on the outside diameter, not nominal pipe size (NPS).

For example:

  • NPS 10 pipe has a fixed OD of 273.05 mm
  • Thickness changes with schedule, but OD remains constant

Using OD ensures consistency across different pipe schedules.

4. Weld Joint Efficiency

Weld joint efficiency accounts for:

  • Type of weld (seamless vs welded)
  • Extent of nondestructive examination (RT, UT)

Typical values:

  • Seamless pipe → efficiency close to 1.0
  • Welded pipe with full radiography → high efficiency
  • Welded pipe with limited examination → reduced efficiency

In power piping, main steam and feedwater lines often require high weld quality, making weld joint efficiency a critical parameter.

Basic Concept of Pipe Thickness Calculation

The thickness calculation ensures that the hoop stress caused by internal pressure does not exceed allowable stress.

In simple terms:

  • Higher pressure → thicker pipe
  • Higher temperature → thicker pipe
  • Lower material strength → thicker pipe

ASME B31.1 provides equations that relate:

  • Design pressure
  • Outside diameter
  • Allowable stress
  • Weld joint efficiency

The result is the minimum required wall thickness for pressure containment.

Corrosion Allowance

Why Corrosion Allowance Is Added

Corrosion allowance is added to account for:

  • Internal corrosion
  • Flow-accelerated corrosion
  • Erosion
  • Chemical attack

Even clean-looking fluids like water or steam can cause long-term wall thinning.

Corrosion allowance ensures that:

  • The pipe remains safe at end of design life
  • Inspection intervals remain manageable
  • Sudden failures are avoided

Typical Corrosion Allowance Values in Power Piping

In power plants, typical corrosion allowance values are:

ServiceTypical Corrosion Allowance
Main steam0 to 1 mm
Boiler feedwater1 to 3 mm
Condensate lines1 to 2 mm
Blowdown lines3 mm or more

Actual values depend on:

  • Water chemistry
  • Velocity
  • Oxygen content
  • Past plant experience

Mill Tolerance and Its Impact

Pipe manufacturers are allowed a negative thickness tolerance, typically:

  • Up to 12.5% thinner than nominal thickness

This means:

  • A 10 mm thick pipe may be supplied at 8.75 mm
  • If corrosion allowance is not considered, failure can occur much earlier than expected

Therefore, piping engineers often:

  • Add corrosion allowance
  • Select a thicker pipe schedule

This is why calculated thickness ≠ selected thickness.

Minimum Thickness vs Practical Thickness

Let us clarify an important concept.

Minimum Required Thickness

  • Calculated using ASME B31.1 equations
  • Includes pressure requirement only

Required Thickness

  • Minimum thickness + corrosion allowance

Nominal Thickness

  • Actual thickness of the selected pipe schedule

In real projects:

  • Engineers select a standard pipe schedule that exceeds required thickness
  • Standardization reduces fabrication errors and cost

Practical Example: Main Steam Line

Service: Superheated steam
Design pressure: 170 bar
Design temperature: 540°C
Material: ASTM A335 P91

Steps followed by piping engineer:

  1. Identify design conditions from P&ID
  2. Select material based on temperature and creep strength
  3. Calculate minimum thickness for pressure
  4. Add corrosion allowance (often minimal for dry steam)
  5. Check mill tolerance
  6. Select next higher standard schedule

Result:

  • Calculated thickness may be 18 mm
  • Selected pipe may be 22 mm or 25 mm

Practical Example: Boiler Feedwater Piping

Service: High-pressure feedwater
Design pressure: 220 bar
Design temperature: 200°C
Material: Carbon steel or low-alloy steel

Challenges:

  • Oxygen corrosion
  • Flow-accelerated corrosion
  • Continuous operation

Design approach:

  • Higher corrosion allowance (2–3 mm)
  • Conservative pipe schedule selection
  • Close coordination with materials engineer
  1. Using operating pressure instead of design pressure
  2. Ignoring corrosion allowance
  3. Forgetting mill tolerance
  4. Selecting pipe schedule before calculation
  5. Copy-pasting thickness from old projects without validation
  6. Ignoring future uprating possibilities

These errors often appear during:

  • Construction stage
  • Fitness-for-service evaluations
  • Unexpected pipe leaks

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Is corrosion allowance mandatory in ASME B31.1?

Corrosion allowance is not optional in practical design. While values may be small for some services, ignoring it is unsafe engineering practice.

Q2: Can I use Schedule 40 for all power piping?

No. Many power piping services require Schedule 80 or higher due to pressure, temperature, or corrosion considerations.

Q3: Does thicker pipe always mean safer design?

Not necessarily. Excessive thickness increases thermal stress and support loads. Balance is required.

Q4: Where do I find design pressure and temperature?

From the P&ID, line list, piping class, and project design basis.


Final Thoughts

Pipe thickness calculation is one of the most fundamental responsibilities of a piping engineer. It combines:

Code knowledge

Material science

Plant experience

Engineering judgment

Understanding why minimum thickness is not enough separates a beginner from a professional piping engineer.

Leave a Comment